Saturday 18 February 2012

Seminar Paper – Karl Marx ‘The Communist Manifesto’

Karl Marx is a German political philosopher, economist and social theorist. He is a very influential man, even to this day, as he published one of the most influential political manuscripts: The Communist Manifesto. This was written in 1848 with the help of Frederick Engels who he met in France when studying socialism. Marx is anti-capitalism, he says in Das Capital that “Capitalism produces all things in profusion, but most of all it produces its own grave diggers”.
His grave stone inscription reads “Workers of all the land unite… The philosophers have only interpreted the world, the point however is to change it” This quote particularly the second half presents to you the kind of man Karl Marx was, he wanted to make a difference. Marx enforced that man is the productive animal because we have the ability to make tools and co-operate. For Aristotle man is the rational animal, for Plato the political animal, for Kant the moral animal, for Hegel the historic animal.
Marx is a technological determinist, which means that he believed technology drove the development of social structure and cultural values. Marx believed you could explain everything about a society by analysing the way economic forces in shape, social, religious, legal and political processes.
Russell tells us that Marx won’t have anything to do with romanticism; his intention is purely to be scientific. He believed his methods were similar to Darwin’s, he would research every single aspect of society in order to understand it. Marx’s philosophy of history has developed through a combination of Hegel and British economics. Marx is a follower of Hegel, he agrees with Hegel’s theory that the world develops according to a dialectic formula. The Hegelian dialectic formula consists of a thesis, which is a proposition, antithesis which counteracts this proposition, and a synthesis which combines the two. For example the thesis would be the bourgeoisie, the antithesis would be the proletariat and the synthesis would be socialism. Although he agrees with this development he disagrees with the mysticism of the ‘Zietgeist’ which is the spirit, as he believes the real dialectic is matter not spirit. 

The Communist Manifesto
The Communist Manifesto is almost 150 years old; it outlines Marxist theories about the nature of society and politics. The first section presents two types of classes, the bourgeoisie being the rich upper class and the proletariats being the poorer working class. The Bourgeoisie are the class of modern capitalists, they are the owners of means of production and employers of wage labour. They are in constant battle with the proletariats who are a class of modern wage labourers with no role in society. Whereas the Bourgeoisies own all factories, farms and properties in society, the proletariats have no status and own nothing, they must buy from the Bourgeoisie.
Marx thinks proletarians are the class with the most revolutionary potential, moving humanity towards freedom. He takes the side of the property-less working class, because he believes “they have a world to win” and “nothing to lose but their chains”, the reference of “chains” relates to Rousseau’s famous quote “Man is born free but is everywhere in chains” essentially meaning we are tied down by laws and more significantly in Marx’s case by class struggles. The communist manifesto outlines his views on the struggle between the class of the bourgeoisie and proletariats; this is clear from the opening line “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” Every class struggle is a political struggle in Marx’s view, he thinks the proletarians will eventually rise to power through class struggle. They say that the Bourgeoisie are essentially giving the working class the weapons that will eventually lead to their downfall. 
The second section ‘Proletarians and Communists’ defends communism, by saying that communists advocate “free love” and claims that because people won’t have an incentive to work in a communist society therefore will not perform labour. It also outlines a set of short term demands that Marx and Engels believe if implemented would lead to a stateless and classless society:
1.     Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2.     A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3.     Abolition of all right of inheritance.
4.     Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5.     Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6.     Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7.     Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with common.
8.     Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9.     Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form and combination of education with industrial production.
Marx categorised a communist society as one close to Utopia and similar to the Garden of Eden. There would be no difference between the social status of a bin man or a doctor, as everyone’s job would be treated with justice and equality. “From each according to ability, to each according to need.” People would choose to work because it was something they enjoyed and were skilled at.  Marx believed that capitalism caused men to alienate themselves and from one another. He stated “I am not myself at work” he believed that work was the loss of the self because people have to put on a front and act a certain way rather then be their true self. There would be no reason to enforce a state as each individual would have an equal share of money.

Marx’s definition of socialism is that the state owns whole means of production, this is the difference between socialism and communism. Socialism essentially causes the liquidation of the Bourgeoisie and therefore there would be no class struggle if they no longer exist; this would be the transitional phase towards communism. Communism is where the state is non existent; it withers away so we live in a state of nature. This relates back to Rousseau, Locke and Hobbes who all hold views on the state of nature. Hobbes believes that in a state of nature we all have the right to do what we will, and therefore life would be “nasty, brutish and short” promoting chaos and “war of all against all”. Hobbes supported an absolute monarchy which completely opposes Marx’s idea of a communist society. Locke believed in natural rights, he stated that “no one ought to harm another in his life, liberty and or property” and if disobeyed then they would be punished. He proposes that people in a state of nature would come together and be governed by their own natural law which is Reason. Rousseau, who was also a keen thinker in the state of nature, believed in a general will, whereby the people come together to agree upon laws based on their own opinion. It is the idea that you represent yourself as an individual. Rousseau believes it is society that civilises us and corrupts us by making us obsess about possessions. Marx would agree with Rousseau view as he too believed we did not need a state to govern us. However, Marx disagrees with Locke's view on protection of property as he held that we should abolish private property in a Communist society.  However, this communist society has been criticised because the Soviet Union which based its principles on Karl Marx’s theories collapsed.

Before a state mankind were communists, through alienation, war, conflict and class division man is reunited with nature, and everyone ends up proletariat and owning nothing. The manifesto ends with a similar phrase to his gravestone, “working men of all countries unite!” showing his persuasion towards a communist society, where each individual would unite together for equality.
Finally I will end with the quote…
“Capitalism comes in to the world dripping from head to good, from every pore, with blood and dirt.”



No comments:

Post a Comment